ATLANTA — Georgia’s highest court handed the residents of Sapelo Island a legal victory, allowing a referendum to limit zoning changes on the island to head to a vote.
According to a judge’s order from the Georgia Supreme Court, the battle over rezoning on Sapelo Island is over.
In a unanimous decision, Georgia justices granted the residents of the historic district a chance to officially adopt the restrictions for developers they’d been fighting to get for years, through a vote on a referendum to amend county zoning rules for the historic area.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Sapelo Island, in McIntosh County, is home to the descendants of slaves taken from West Africa.
Previously, a lower court ruling had stopped a referendum to consider repealing a revised zoning ordinance passed by McIntosh County officials two years ago. Sapelo Island residents opposed the zoning amendments that doubled the size of homes allowed in a tiny enclave called Hogg Hummock.
RELATED STORIES:
- Judge blocks larger home permits for tiny community of slave descendants pending appeal
- Judge asked to cancel referendum in slave descendants’ zoning battle with Georgia county
- Georgia county seeking to dismiss lawsuit by slave descendants over rezoning of their island homes
- Slaves’ descendants seek a referendum to veto zoning changes they say threaten their Georgia island
Developers, and county officials, had sued to move forward, leading to the court battle.
According to the court decision, the referendum voted upon and passed by residents to block zoning changes on Sapelo Island will stand.
However, county officials moved to block the referendum, leading to a fight in court.
County officials who tried to argue in court that the referendum “improperly ‘alters the status quo’ by not allowing approval of building permit applications,” were told their argument was unable to prevail as they are basing their argument on items not included in their appeal, nor in the court record.
Additionally, as the county could not show proof of its allegations for the impacts of the referendum, the GSC said they must instead affirm a previous ruling allowing the zoning restriction.
The state justices affirmed the decision unanimously, allowing a vote on the referendum to move forward.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
©2025 Cox Media Group





