by: Scott MacFarlane Updated:
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court took up historic arguments Tuesday over same-sex marriage, but there is no guarantee of a historic ruling.
Channel 2's Scott MacFarlane was in the court room for Tuesday's arguments.
MacFarlane said the justices weren't questioning only whether California's same-sex marriage ban is constitutional, but were questioning whether they should even be hearing this case at all.
Outside the Supreme Court, a wall of people gathered, both in support of California's ban and in support of same-sex marriage.
"There are young people who believe that marriage is between one man and woman," Vivian Pineda told MacFarlane.
"Everyone's optimistic something positive will happen for the movement," said Jaspal
Walled off from the hoopla, just seconds after arguments began, justices questioned whether the case should even be heard.
That's in part because the people challenging California's same-sex marriage ban aren't state officials.
"They have no proprietary interest in it. It's the law for
One justice said legal
"When did it become unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage?" Justice Antonin Scalia asked.
The attorney defending California's ban, Charles Cooper, said gay marriage would hurt the institution.
"Redefining marriage will have real-world consequences. And it is impossible for anyone to foresee the future accurately," Cooper said.
"This is a measure that walls off the institution of marriage, which is not society's right," said attorney Ted
MacFarlane said arguments ran nearly twice as long as expected -- perhaps a sign the Supreme Court recognizes the significance of this case.
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments over the federal ban on some financial benefits afforded to same-sex married couples.
Rulings on the same-sex marriage cases are expected by June.
U.S. Supreme Court hears historic arguments on same-sex marriage
Man dressed as Zorro detained during LAX panic
Brothers arrested in the shooting death of Dwyane Wade's cousin
A $400 million cash payment to Iran has little precedent
One year after a reporter and cameraman were killed on live TV, WDBJ…